First Republic Bank

Case Details

Class Period: January 14, 2021 - March 14, 2023
Date Filed: April 24, 2023
Case Number: 4:23cv01993
Jurisdiction: Northern District of California
icon-casetype Case Type: Securities Case
Days Left to
Seek Plaintiff:

Case Summary

First Republic is a California state-chartered bank and trust company that provides private banking, private business banking, and private wealth management. Much of First Republic’s customer base consists of wealthy households living in U.S. coastal cities, and a key component of First Republic’s lending strategy has been to provide these wealthy households with residential mortgages at low interest rates.

The complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants misrepresented the strength of First Republic’s balance sheet, liquidity, and position in the market. Among other things, Defendants understated and concealed the magnitude of the risks facing the Company’s business model that would result from any decision by the Federal Reserve System raising the federal funds rate, thereby undermining the value of the Company’s loan and securities portfolios and liquidity. As a result of Defendants’ misrepresentations and omissions, First Republic securities traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period.

The truth began to emerge on October 14, 2022, when First Republic announced disappointing third quarter 2022 financial results, reporting that the Company’s net interest income growth had slowed to 20.6% year-over-year (down from 24.1% year-over-year growth the prior quarter) and its net interest margin (“NIM”) had plummeted to 2.71% (down from 2.80% the prior quarter). First Republic attributed the decrease in the Company’s NIM to “average funding costs increasing more rapidly than the offsetting increase in the average yields on interest-earning assets.” As a result of these disclosures, the price of First Republic common stock declined by $22.14 per share, or more than 16%.

Then, on March 8, 2023, SVB Financial Group (“SVB”), the parent company of Silicon Valley Bank (considered by many analysts to be a peer bank of First Republic) announced that it was seeking to raise approximately $2.25 billion in capital due to continued higher interest rates, pressured public and private markets, and elevated levels of deposit attrition. SVB also disclosed that it had sold “substantially all of its available for sale securities portfolio,” incurring a loss of approximately $1.8 billion on the sale. As a result, on March 10, 2023, SVB collapsed, and regulators seized control of the bank, placing SVB in FDIC receivership. Notwithstanding assurances from First Republic and its executives about the Company’s operating strength and ability to withstand a rising interest rate environment, investors immediately began to question First Republic’s ability to withstand the interest rate environment and remain solvent. On this news, the price of First Republic common stock declined by an astonishing $83.79 per share, or more than 72%, over three trading sessions.

Despite statements from First Republic and its executives confirming the stability of the Company’s business model, investors learned more about First Republic’s vulnerability on March 15, 2023, when S&P Global Rating downgraded its long-term issuer credit rating and preferred stock issue rating for First Republic due to the risks of deposit outflows leading to increased funding costs. That same day, Fitch Ratings announced that it had also downgraded First Republic’s credit rating, observing that the Company’s “funding and liquidity profile has changed and represents a ‘weakest link.’” On the news of the downgrades, the price of First Republic common stock declined by $8.47 per share, or more than 21%.